2002 (12) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rned A.P.P. Mr. Adsule for respondent No. 2, Mr. R.F. Lambey for Respondent No. 1 and Mr. J.C. Satpute for respondent No. 3. 2. This revision application is preferred from the order dated 29th October, 2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, in Criminal Appeal No. 139 of 2001 filed against the order of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Bombay, in Criminal Case No. 609/CW/199 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... prisonment. Clearly under the impression that the facts of the case attracted the provisions of Section 135 (1)(i). 3. Considering the fact that this is an isolated attempt and there is nothing on record to show that it was part of an organized attempt to smuggle such goods on regular basis I am of the opinion that the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, is on t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X