TMI Blog2002 (1) TMI 88X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dered to be arrayed as respondents in Special Civil Application No. 11935 of 2001. Disposed of accordingly. Special Civil Application No. 11935 of 2001 : 2. We have heard Mr. Mihir Thakor, Senior Counsel with Mr. R.S. Sanjanwala for the petitioner, Mr. D.N. Patel, learned Counsel for the Union of India and Mr. P.R. Nanavati, learned Counsel for newly arrayed respondents. 3. By way of this pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as to take a decision for imposing a provisional duty which is to be followed by final finding of the Designated Authority under Rule 17 and payment of duty as necessary levy by the Central Government, under Rule 18 of the Rules. 4. After examining the relevant provisions of the Rules and in light of the order of the Supreme Court in case of Saurashtra Chemicals v. Union of India, 2000 (118) E.L ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nder Rule 13 for the purpose of deciding the question of imposing provisional anti-dumping duty and the Central Government is required to issue notification for imposing anti-dumping duty. Such notification of imposing duty has not been issued so far by the Central Government. By our earlier order representation to the Central Government on the preliminary finding. However, at this stage, we direc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
