TMI Blog2004 (2) TMI 217X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the appellant and Shri Sanjay Singhal, ld. JDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue. 2. The ld. Consultant submitted that this is the second round of litigation and there is a delay of two months in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. He submitted that the applicant is a chronic asthma patient and he had a severe attack on 28-8-2003. When he went to the Doctor, the Doctor advised him to go t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etence on the part of the applicant to cover the delay of two months. He, therefore, contended that the application for condonation of delay, filed by the applicant is devoid of merits and needs to be dismissed. 4. On a specific query from the Bench, 'whether the appellant was hospitalised in Jaipur', the ld. Consultant has replied "No". 5. After hearing both sides and perusal of the records, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
