2004 (11) TMI 252

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appellants filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. 2. Since the benefit of Cenvat was denied to the appellants on the ground that the supplier of the inputs paid duty under protest. 3. The appellants were working under the Cenvat Scheme and were taking credit in respect of the inputs used in the manufacture of final product. The appellants w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inputs under invoices showing the payment of duty. There is no dispute by the Revenue regarding the payment of duty by TISCO. Once the duty has been paid whether paid under protest or otherwise by the manufacturer of the inputs, the appellants are entitled for the credit in respect of the duty paid of the inputs. In this circumstances, the credit cannot be denied to the appellants only on the gro .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X