Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (2) TMI 196

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re clearly printed on the labels :- Caldhan - "Animal feed supplement" "Not for medicinal use" Livfit Vet - "Poultry Feed Supplement" "Not for medicinal use" 2.2 He, further, mentioned that the impugned products are not bought and sold as Ayurvedic medicaments that the samples of the products were drawn and the CRCL has opined that Ayucal Premix and Livfit can be considered as animal feed supplements; that in respect of Caldhan suspension, the CRCL has opined that the product may be considered as medicament; that ignoring these test reports the Commissioner has relied upon the reports given by Indian Veterinary Research Institute which has classified the impugned products as Ayurvedic medicaments. He submitted that it is settled legal position that when the CRCL has given its report, Revenue is not to go by opinions given by some other authorities. He relied upon the decision in M.P. Industries v. CCE - [2002 (145) E.L.T. 448 (T)]. 3.1 The learned Advocate mentioned that the Commissioner has given the following reasons for classifying the impugned products as veterinary medicaments (i) Products co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oned. He mentioned that Caldhan suspension takes care of the deficiency of calcium and phosphorus in respect of cattle and horses, sheep and goats; that Livfit Vet is recommended for chicks, layers/broilers; that it is also recommended for offsetting the damaging effects of aflatoxins, restoring reduced feed intake, improving liver functions, better feed utilization, growth, livability and production; that it is for keeping the liver fit. He also mentioned that the Adjudicating Authority has completely ignored the voluminous evidences adduced by them in the form of export opinion from various doctors, research institutions and end users certifying that the products are animal feed supplement; that the opinion is unanimous in that these products are not used as medicines as it can not cure a disease or prevent the disease as a medicine. He referred to some of such opinions/certificates which are as under :- (a) Dr. M A Mujeeb Ather, Poultry Pathologist, Veterinary Biological Research Institute, Hyderabad. (b) Dr. V.S. Narsapur, Head of Department, Bombay Veterinary College (Retired), Mumbai. (c) Dr. Mahesh Kumar, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... itives or supplementary feeds for animals." He also mentioned that the Larger Bench has held that the "End use assumes importance in view of the fact that description of the goods under Heading 23.02 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 reads 'Preparations of a kind used for animal feeding including Dog and Cat food..' The term used here is very important. For satisfaction of this term, we have to examine as to how the product is used. We have examined the use of the preparation and the label. We have also seen the expert opinion and the affidavits of the Dealers/Users indicating that the product is known as animal feed supplement by the trade who use this preparation or who deal in these preparations. Thus, the labels, affixed on the preparations for the purpose of sale, Certificates by the Experts and Manufacturers' Association and the Affidavit by the Users/Dealers clearly indicate that the preparations are animal feed supplements." He also stated that the Supreme Court has affirmed the decision in CCE, Bangalore v. Tetragon Chemie P. Ltd. [2001 (132) E.L.T. 525 (S.C.)] Reliance has also been placed on the decision in the case of CCE, Vadodara v. M.J. Agro Chemicals [2000 (118) E. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Livfit vet liquid/concentrate and Caldhan do not fall in the category of animal feed. 7. The learned Senior Departmental Representative also reiterated the findings contained in the impugned order and emphasised that the impugned products contain herbs and are recommended for substantial therapeutic use and administered as per doses prescribed for a limited period or as prescribed by veterinarian, that Ayucal premix is also to be administered by mixing uniformly in feed for 7/10 days or as advised by Veterinarian and prevents rickets, prolapse, osteoporosis and osteomalacia. She also emphasised that on some of the samples, the words "Physician's Sample" were mentioned which goes to show that the impugned goods are medicaments; that it has been held in the case of Shree Baidynath Ayurved Bhawan Ltd. v. CCE, Nagpur [1996 (83) E.L.T. 492 (S.C.)] that medicine is ordinarily prescribed by medical practitioner and it is used for limited time and not every day unless it is so prescribed to deal with a specific disease. Finally, the learned Senior Departmental Representative submitted that the larger period of limitation is invocable for demanding duty inasmuch as the Appellants have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ody-building nutrients", mentions that "The minerals serve mainly for building up bones and, in the case of poultry, making egg-shells. The most commonly used contain calcium, phosphorus, chlorine, sodium, potassium, iron, iodine, etc." Heading also covers preparations, known in trade as "pre-mixes" which are generally speaking, compound composition consisting of a number of substances (sometimes called additives). These substances are of three types - (1) Those which improve digestion; (2) Those designed to preserve the feeding stuffs; (3) Those which serve as carriers. 8.4 The Larger Bench of the Tribunal has the occasion to examine the scope of Heading 23.02 in Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. v. CCE [2001 (138) E.L.T. 414 (Tri. - LB). The Larger Bench has held, after analyzing the technical literature, that "preparations containing vitamins, proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, etc. are feed additives or supplementary feeds for animals." The Larger Bench has also held that for the purpose of satisfying the term "preparations of a kind used for animal feeding", "We have to examine as to how the product is used." 9.1 The Adjudicating Authority has referred to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... impugned products are meant for therapeutic or prophylactic uses. These uses, as reflected from the packing materials, are duly covered by the Explanatory Notes of HSN i.e. to ensure the safeguard of health and acts as body building nutrients. For any product to be classified as a medicament, it is pre-requisite that the product is for therapeutic or prophylactic uses. This requirement is not satisfied in respect of the impugned products. 10. Now coming to the test reports and opinions brought on record by both the sides, we observe that the CRCL has opined that the Livfit Vet is not described in authoritative books for ayurvedic medicines and it can be considered as Animal fed supplement. CRCL has also opined in respect of Ayucal Premix to be animal feed supplement. The Centre of Advance Studies, Izatnagar refrained itself from giving a clear finding in respect of Livfit Vet and suggested that the Department can decide the product on the basis of governing Rules and difference between 'annual feed supplement' and 'medicaments'. The Office of Animal Nutritional Institute, Jaipur has mentioned that at the institute, they only make proximate analyses of the animal food and the samp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1996 (83) E.L.T. 492] does not lay down the law that whenever a product is prescribed by a medical practitioner and the same is used for limited time and not everyday, it becomes a medicine. A physician may recommend use of Vitamins, a particular food, consumption of egg or use of a particular shampoo, etc. for a limited period. Such recommendation will not make all these products a medicament. The learned Advocate has referred to the opinion of Dr. Mahesh Kumar, Associate Professor of G.B. Pant University of Agriculture Technology. Dr. Mahesh Kumar has opined that caldhan can be recognized as a tonic or feed supplement only which provides low levels of calcium or phosphate to the animals and thereby helps in maintaining tonicity of muscles; caldhan cannot be used for therapy of milk fever as it provides only 325 mg calcium per 20 ml whereas for the therapeutic management of milk fever, a minimum of 100-150 g calcium should be given intravenously as 20-30% solution. The Chemical Examiner has also not commented on the words "NOT FOR MEDICINAL USE" printed on the label. The Revenue, thus has not succeeded in proving that any of the impugned product is having therapeutic or prophyla .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates