Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (6) TMI 108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion of the earlier years. Further the capital gains and income from other sources of the current year were also set off against the balance unabsorbed depreciation and investment allowance. There was no positive income on which tax was payable. The Assessing Officer again initiated proceedings under section 154 and in this 154 order he determined the book profits of the assessee under section 115J at Rs. 59,60,176 and on this amount a tax of Rs. 17,88,952 was levied. it is this order dated 8-1-1992 that has given rise to this appeal. 3. It is contended on behalf of the assessee that the order passed by the Assessing Officer under the provisions of section 154 is without jurisdiction. The provisions of section 154 are intended to rectify o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gains have to be kept in wraps. When such is the position the fact that no deduction under section 80HHC has been allowed to the assessee for want of gross total income cannot be relied upon by the Assessing Officer for levying the additional tax. A plain reading of sub-clause (iii) of the Explanation to section 115J(1A) would also indicate that the profits as determined under Parts II & III of Schedule VI of the Companies Act have to be reduced by an amount to which the assessee would otherwise be eligible for deduction in terms of the provisions of section 80HHC. Elaborating further it is submitted that what is required to be done is to determine the eligible deduction under section 80HHC de hors the availability of gross total income and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Act. Our attention in this connection is also invited to the Circular No. 559 dated 4-5-1990 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes explaining the scope and effect of the newly inserted sub-clause (iii) of Explanation to section 115J(1A) of the Act. After admitting that if an adjustment is not made that would result in dilution of the provisions of section 80HHC, which have an important role to play in the promotion of exports, the Board has advised that the profits, which would be exempt under sections 80HHC and 80HHD should be excluded from the purview of section 115J of the IT Act. The Board also explained that the sub-clause (iii) to the Explanation to section 115J(1A) was inserted with this purpose in view. Any other view if ta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f an assessee, and further what could be rectified under section 154 is a glaring and patent mistake. However, the claim of the assessee that whether deductions under section 80HHC have to be allowed before set off of unabsorbed depreciation and unabsorbed loss is not free from doubt has to be rejected. This issue stands squarely concluded by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 113 ITR 84 and a later decision in the case of Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India [1985] 155 ITR 120. The Apex Court had held that a deduction under Chapter VIA of the IT Act could be allowed only if there is a gross total income and the gross total income having regard to the defini .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... would be no justification to read something which has not been incorporated in the Circular, namely that what the Board intended was the exclusion of the amount eligible for deduction under section 80HHC even though the same could not be allowed in the assessment made under any of the provisions of the Act. It is inconceivable that where a deduction under section 80HHC is not allowable to the assessee the same would have to be taken into consideration for reducing its liability under section 115J of the Act. Neither the Circular relied upon by the assessee nor the decisions adverted to in the course of arguments in any way advance the case of the assessee. The issue in this case is very simple. The original assessment was completed and the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates