It is not open to the Revenue to accept a judgement in the case ...

Revenue Must Consistently Apply Judgments Across Taxpayer Cases Without Unjust Challenges.

May 22, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

It is not open to the Revenue to accept a judgement in the case of an assessee and challenge its correctness in the case of any other assessee without just cause. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

It is not open to the Revenue to accept a judgement in the case ...

Revenue Must Consistently Apply Judgments Across Taxpayer Cases Without Unjust Challenges.

May 22, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT upheld multiple findings from CIT(A), predominantly favoring the assessee across various contested issues. Key determinations include deletion of additions under...

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

The ITAT considered whether an assessing officer can refer to a registered valuer u/s 55A based on physical appearance during search/survey without rejecting books of...

ITAT upheld the segmentation of the taxpayer's business into Manufacturing and Trading segments for transfer pricing benchmarking purposes, following the coordinate...

HC found multiple GST notifications challenging deadline extensions during COVID-19 potentially procedurally defective. While the core validity issue is pending before...

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s finding regarding unaccounted sales, dismissing Revenue's appeal. The tribunal determined that a substantial portion of allegedly unaccounted sales...

Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens applied. Agreement dated 17.08.1990 not found fraudulent or result of collusion between plaintiff and...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

CESTAT appellate proceedings involving silver jewelry manufacturer. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, addressing multiple key issues: (1) goods classified...

The ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer, determining that fabrication charges received could not be treated as "fees for technical services" under Article 12(4)(a) of...

Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the principal unjust enrichment does not apply to cases where duty has been paid to protest - unjust enrichment...

Challenge to the recovery notices without challenging the order-in-original - service tax was collected but not paid - the petitioner cannot challenge the consequential order - HC

The HC disposed of the petition regarding cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration due to non-filing of statutory returns for six continuous months. Following...

Quick Updates: