Stay of recovery - unlike the cases u/s 35F of the Central ...

Income Tax

July 9, 2013

Stay of recovery - unlike the cases u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, a strong prima facie case is not the indicator nor would be a motivating factor or consideration in exercising the discretion u/s 220(6) - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Stay of recovery - unlike the cases u/s 35F of the Central ...

Income Tax

July 9, 2013

You may also like:

CENVAT Credit - supplementary invoice issued for service tax paid later - the appellant have strong prima facie case in their favour - stay granted - AT

Works contract services - lift irrigation schemes - lift irrigation schemes are within the socope of Notification No. 41/2009-S.T. - strong prima facie case in favour...

Notification no. 10/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 benefit denied - power driven pump - prima facie the applicants have made out a strong case for waiver of pre-deposit - AT

Valuation of goods - dealers of Maruti Suzuki are charging price over and above the ex-showroom price from the ultimate customers of the vehicles - prima facie case is...

IPR service - Transfer of rights - Since we have found a prima facie case on the ground that the transfer in this case cannot be considered as a temporary one, stay granted - AT

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Stay of demand for penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - quantum appeal pending - assessee prima-facie having fair chance of win - enforcement for recovery would cause serious loss...

Import of services - in the absence of clear classification of service, appellant has made out a prima facie case - stay granted - AT

Business Auxiliary Service - Agreement for playing matches for Royal Challengers Bangalore in IPL - prima facie case is in favor of assessee - stay granted - AT

Waiver of pre-deposit - tribunal to consider prima-facie case or to study the matter in detail in stay application - order of the tribunal on merit is not correct - HC

Quick Updates: