Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Adhoc disallowance of 50% out of ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Adhoc disallowance of 50% out of miscellaneous expenses was made by the A.O. on estimated basis - said estimate was revised by the CIT(A) to 10% - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of transport expenses - payment made in cash - Just because the payments were made in cash cannot be a basis to doubt the...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

  8. Penalty u/ s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance on account of personnel expenses, operative expenses and finance expenses - it a “mere disallowance” of an expense does not warrant...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

  11. Levy of Penalty u/s 271AAA or u/s 271(1)(c) - whether addition is made on estimation basis or on the basis of certain evidences, fact remains that the additions made in...

  12. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

  14. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates