Defreezing Bank Account - since the petitioner is issued with a ...

Respondent Freezes Bank Account for Tax Dues Just 3 Days After Show Cause Notice, Violating 30-Day Response Period.

September 6, 2013

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Defreezing Bank Account - since the petitioner is issued with a show cause notice dated 12.03.2013 extending 30 days time to file its explanation and therefore in the interregnum, the respondent was not justified in issuing the letter dated 15.03.2013, three days after issue of show cause notice to freeze the bank account of the petitioner for recovery of tax dues. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Defreezing Bank Account - since the petitioner is issued with a ...

Respondent Freezes Bank Account for Tax Dues Just 3 Days After Show Cause Notice, Violating 30-Day Response Period.

September 6, 2013

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

Seeking directions to de-freeze the bank accounts - The court carefully examined the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and found that the freezing of bank...

HC held that issuance of Summary of Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 without a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73 of CGST/SGST Act is invalid. Proper Show Cause Notice...

Challenging the validity of show cause notice (SCN) - Recovery of Swachh Bharat Cess - service provided by the petitioner by putting in rail linings - The High Court...

Rejection of request for provisional release of the seized goods - high end wrist watches - prohibited goods or not - In the present case, the appellant had not only...

The High Court held that the Summary of Show Cause Notice along with the attachment containing tax determination cannot substitute a proper Show Cause Notice as mandated...

Seizure and attachment of the bank account - Since it is an admitted fact that the subject matter bank account is not so far issued with any order of attachment or...

Seeking Condonation of Delay of 14 days in filing of the Appeal - It is really strange that the agency of the Government failed to seek the required information within...

The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of...

Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Ex-parte assessment order - service of notice - it is alleged that the orders have been issued in complete violation to section 73 (8) of the GST Act which prescribes...

This case deals with the validity of assessment proceedings initiated against an amalgamated company for the assessment year 2018-19. The key points are: The Assessing...

Notice of demand u/s 156 - Period of statutory period for deposit of demand reduced from 30 days to 7 days - it cannot be said that non-meeting of the budgetary deficit...

Validity of SCN - If the contents of impugned show cause notice are lacking in material particulars or are vague in regard to any of the entries contained therein then...

Quick Updates: