Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2013 Year 2013 This

Demand u/s 11D – assessee had issued bogus invoices for 3% ...

Central Excise

November 23, 2013

Demand u/s 11D – assessee had issued bogus invoices for 3% commission without supply any goods - demand u/s 11D dropped - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Bogus purchases - addition made on the basis of Maharastra VAT authorities to the effect that assessee’s suppliers have issued bogus invoices without involving any...

  2. Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

  3. Recovery u/s 11D of CEA - during the exemption limit, the same price was charged towards the sale of the goods, but during the exemption limit, the appellant have not...

  4. Levy of penalty on dealers who issues Bogus Invoices - Cenvat Credit - Bogus credit - levy of penalty confirmed, though reduced - AT

  5. The appellants have issued invoices without payment of duty and issue of invoice without payment of duty is contravention of provision of Cenvat Credit Rules - Levy of...

  6. Taxability - supply of tangible goods service - Tribunal set aside the demand - CESTAT has recorded only an abrupt finding without discussing the issue and without...

  7. Demand u/s 11D - collection in the name of duty of excise - respondent issued debit note to adjust the difference in the price of invoice and money paid, by cheque (for...

  8. Bogus invoices issued to take cenvat credit – Revenue has been able to make out a very good case for fraudulent conduct and issue of paper transactions to avail...

  9. Recovery of amount collected by appellant from their customers - It cannot be accepted that delay in taking up the adjudication proceedings denovo would vitiate the...

  10. Demand u/s 11D - appellant collected duty from the seller to compensate the loss of CENVAT credit not taken by them on their raw materials - demand confirmed - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates