Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an ...

Central Excise

November 25, 2013

Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an amount of Rs.18,75,000/- under protest by debit entries in the cenvat credit account - refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an ...

Central Excise

November 25, 2013

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - and amount of pre-deposit - Refund allowed - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund of India - o the amount deposited during investigation, basing - The...

Refund – unjust enrichment – Merely because the interest amount was not shown as recoverable amount from the customers, clause of unjust enrichment cannot be attracted - AT

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Tribunal on merit of claim held that no service tax is payable - the adjudicating authority did sanction the refund but...

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Refund Claim - unjust enrichment - As the entire amount has been recovered from the ultimate buyers including the duty element, unjust enrichment is attracted.

Quick Updates: