Dismissal of stay application - mere absence of an appellant or ...

Court Rules Absence on One Date Not Enough to Dismiss Stay Application or Appeal by Default.

January 26, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Dismissal of stay application - mere absence of an appellant or his counsel on one date, “may” not be sufficient to dismiss an application/appeal for default. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Dismissal of stay application - mere absence of an appellant or ...

Court Rules Absence on One Date Not Enough to Dismiss Stay Application or Appeal by Default.

January 26, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Power to conduct service tax audit / Revenue Audit – Validity of Rule 5A of Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Supreme Court stayed the order of High Court - SC

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court...

The High Court or Sessions Court should be reluctant to grant an interim stay on the operation of an order granting bail pending disposal of the cancellation application...

The High Court addressed the issue of extending stay beyond 365 days by ITAT under the third proviso to Section 254(2A) with the 2008 Finance Act amendment. The...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Maintainability of Revision Petition before the High Court when the petitioner has alternate remedies as per the - an ex-parte decree was passed against the respondent -...

Stay of Refund - Refund claim under rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 – unable to utilize the credit on account of closure of their factory - grant of refund stayed - AT

Suo motu adjustment of excess service tax paid – Rule 6(4A) - stay granted.

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

HC determined that Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules, 2017 was unconditionally omitted without a saving clause, rendering subsequent administrative orders invalid. Referencing...

HC ruled that principles of res judicata apply to subsequent applications u/s 466 of Companies Act, 1956. The Court dissolved the stay on winding-up proceedings,...

Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

Quick Updates: