Appellant's refunds of interest, paid as per the provision of ...

Customs

February 25, 2014

Appellant's refunds of interest, paid as per the provision of Sec. 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, will not be hit by the doctrine of unjust enrichment - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant's refunds of interest, paid as per the provision of ...

Customs

February 25, 2014

You may also like:

Unjust enrichment - Section 27(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 - the question of providing unjust enrichment would not arise in the case of refund of cash securities - AT

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund of deposit - Applicability of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Unjust enrichment - The factual finding of the tribunal is correct - refund allowed - HC

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Denial of refund claim - Finalization of provisional assessment - prior to the amendment i.e. 13-7-2006, this doctrine of unjust enrichment was not attracted to refund...

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

Refund claim hit by bar of unjust enrichment or not - sale through depot - there is no evidence on record that the appellant subsequently recovered the amount from their...

Quick Updates: