Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2014 Year 2014 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - MAT u/s 115JB was greater than the ...


Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Imposed When MAT Exceeds Regular Income, Book Profit Deemed Total Income.

May 7, 2014

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - MAT u/s 115JB was greater than the regular income, book profit was taken as deemed total income u/s 115JB of the Act - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was not imposable on the assessee - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  2. Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  4. The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

  5. The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

  6. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

  8. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  9. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

  10. To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

  11. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  12. This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

  13. Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - not offering correct MAT on the book profit u/s 115JB - assessee had not furnished any detail of MAT calculation and also had not filed form 29B...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates