Refund of SAD - notification no. 102/07-Cus - it was evident ...

Customs

May 17, 2014

Refund of SAD - notification no. 102/07-Cus - it was evident from the invoices that necessary condition prescribed in the notification has not been fulfilled by the importer - refund denied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of SAD - notification no. 102/07-Cus - it was evident ...

Customs

May 17, 2014

You may also like:

Refund of SAD - Notification no. 102/2007 dated 14.09.2007 - although they have not made an endorsement on the invoice that credit of duty is not admissible, refund allowed - AT

Violation of Notification No. 102/2007 - Refund of SAD - Whether subsequent Notification No. 29/2010-Cus., dated 27-2-2010 should be read as clarificatory and...

SAD Refund - whether the appellant have committed any illegality in filing the two claims for refund of SAD under Notification No.102/07/CUS, with respect to two...

Refund of SAD - Notification No. 102/2007 - Appellant failed to make any endorsement in the commercial invoices issued for the domestic sale that "no credit of SAD of...

Refund of SAD - payment of 4% SAD has not been made by cash, but has been paid using the Reward Scrip i.e. Focus Product Scheme. - there is no condition in Notification...

Seeks to amend Notifications 100/2009-Cus, 101/2009-Cus, 102/2009-Cus and 103/2009-Cus all dt.11-09-2009 and 104/2009-Cus dt.14-09-2009 - Notification

Refund of SAD - mis-match of description of the goods - The SAD is paid on importation of the goods to safe guard the revenue of the state i.e. VAT/CST. As the same has...

Refund of SAD - benefit of N/N. 102/97-Cus. - As there is no tax invoice or any other invoice, hence there is no question of passing on of SAD to the buyer of the...

Refund of SAD - payment of interest on late refund of SAD - Interest would be payable in terms of Section 27A of the Customs Act on refund of SAD - HC

Period of limitation for filing refund claim of SAD - Notification No.102/2007 Cus - the original exemption notification neither stipulated a time period, it was...

Quick Updates: