Wrong mentioning of address in the PAC was only due to ...

Central Excise

June 30, 2014

Wrong mentioning of address in the PAC was only due to typographical mistake. A procedural mistake cannot be made the basis for denying substantive right when such a manufacturing facility is not available at their Makarpura unit of the appellant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Wrong mentioning of address in the PAC was only due to ...

Central Excise

June 30, 2014

You may also like:

Exemption u/s 11 denied - certain mistakes were made in ticking of certain circle - i A typographical mistake or minor procedural lapse cannot act as an estoppel to deny...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Denying of CENVAT Credit - Availment of credit on the basis of Advice of Transfer Debit - procedural lapse cannot be considered as a reason to deny Cenvat credit involved - AT

Clandestine Removal - Supply of goods against ICB - sub-contractor of the main contractor - When the goods have been found to have been cleared towards the power project...

Short payment of duty due to wrong availment of Excess Cenvat Credit - Payment of duty in Cash - default mentioned under Rule 8(3A) is applicable in short payment of...

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

Levy of penalty - Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - wrong E-way bill - in penal provision such as Section 129 of the GST Act, the element of intention to evade tax...

Failure to service notice due to wrong email address - The assessee was not served notice due to wrong reference of email address, therefore, in our view the assessee...

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Wrong mention of unit name in invoices - Assessee's address was correctly mentioned - just for this mistake the denial of Cenvat credit is...

Notice u/s 143(2) with wrong date of filing of return - the error has occurred due to typographical mistake and hence it is curable as per provisions of section 292B of...

Quick Updates: