Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an ...

Income Tax

July 16, 2014

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an ...

Income Tax

July 16, 2014

You may also like:

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(a)(c) - The explanation filed by the assessee about not disclosing interest income in the return of income was not bona fide - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT upheld penalty - the onus of proving and disproving keeps on shifting as the proceedings are advanced. - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

Quick Updates: