Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - Respondent is situated in ...

Service Tax

September 20, 2014

Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - Respondent is situated in Punjab and therefore judgement pronounced by Punjab and Haryana High Court which is jurisdictional High Court, has to be followed - penalties are not imposable simultaneously even prior to amendment on 10.5.2008 in the jurisdiction of Punjab & Haryana High Court - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - Respondent is situated in ...

Service Tax

September 20, 2014

You may also like:

Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - proviso to Section 78 made it explicit which was till then implicit - simultaneous penalty under section 76 and 78 of the Finance...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Penalty u/s 78 - Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - penalties u/s. 76 and 78 of the Finance Act are simultaneously imposable upon a assessee for the period prior to 10....

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

BOTH PENALTIES UNDER SECTION 76 & 78 CAN NOT BE LEVIED - Article

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

Quick Updates: