CIT cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act for setting ...

Income Tax

December 4, 2014

CIT cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act for setting aside the assessment order if he does not agree with the conclusion of the AO on a particular issue - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIT cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act for setting ...

Income Tax

December 4, 2014

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Use of word "seems" by the CIT while recording reasons - It seems that, Assessment order passed by the A.O. in this case is erroneous and prejudicial...

Revision u/s 263 - cash expenditure , prior period expenses, provisions for incentive etc. - CIT has not exercised jurisdiction u/s 263 on the ground of ‘no enquiry’ or...

Revision u/s 263 - violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) - CIT is not justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 on the strength of an audit note - AT

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - AO has taken a possible view that the deposits/credits in the bank account was on account of sale of banana and has...

Revision u/s 263 - another possible view of the matter - The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the PCIT, arguing that the original assessment order by the AO was...

Stay petition - Exercise the jurisdiction of CIT(A) to decide u/s 251(1)(c) - CIT(A) directed the assessee to file stay petition before the AO - order set aside.

Reopening of assessment - AO has invoked the jurisdiction u/s 147 of the Act without completing original enquiry initiated u/s 143(2) - such proceeding is irregular and illegal

Revision u/s 263 - Ld. Pr. CIT exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act, directed the AO to make fresh assessment on the issues which were not the subject...

Revision u/s 263 - during the course of assessment, the AO made an addition on account of unexplained cash credit of unsecured loan u/s 68 - AO omitted to disallow the...

Revision u/s 263 - The principal of the law emanating that when two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous...

Quick Updates: