Restriction of penalty imposed u/s 140A(3) to 25% - when the ...

Income Tax

December 24, 2014

Restriction of penalty imposed u/s 140A(3) to 25% - when the authorities were justified in restricting the penalty to 25% based on cogent material and finding, more so when it is discretionary as the same is clearly rendered u/s 221 order of tribunal sustained - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Restriction of penalty imposed u/s 140A(3) to 25% - when the ...

Income Tax

December 24, 2014

You may also like:

The car which was imported, was imported first time in India without homologation certificate - restriction rightly imposed - confiscation, redemption fine and penalty...

Penalty imposed u/s 221(1) r.w.s. 140A(3) - non-payment of self-assessment tax - Return of Income as filed u/s 139(1) itself was declared an invalid Return - scope of...

Penalty levied on the assessee/Trust under Section 273(2)(a) and under Section 140A(3) - filing NIL estimate of advance tax and nonpayment of the self assessment tax -...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Penalty proceedings - Commissioner is not justified in exercising his suo motu powers to interfere with a discretionary order passed by the original authority to impose...

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Penalty imposed u/s 221(1) r.w.s. 140A(3) - non-payment of self-assessment tax - without there being any requisite corresponding amendment to Sec. 221 in consonance with...

It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

Power of authorities to block Input Tax Credit of the registered recipient - Rule 86-A of CGST Rules, 2017 - Rule 86-A (3) is very specific to the effect that the...

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 cannot be imposed upon the main appellant for goods not manufactured by him - however penalty on director under Rule 26 confirmed - AT

Quick Updates: