Labour charges paid to the female relatives of the directors ...

Income Tax

January 14, 2015

Labour charges paid to the female relatives of the directors disallowed u/s 40A(2)(b) - there was no finding the effect that the labour charges paid were in excess of the fair market charges - expenses allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Labour charges paid to the female relatives of the directors ...

Income Tax

January 14, 2015

You may also like:

Addition u/s 40A(2)(b) - payment sub-contractors who are the relative of the partners - the authority had rightly disallowed the expenditure so claimed by the assessee - HC

Disallowance of directors remuneration u/s 40A(2)(a) - A.O by misconstruing the scope and gamut of Sec. 40A(2)(a) had disallowed the entire amount of the directors...

Deletion of disallowance of labour charges – assessee could not substantiate with corroborative evidences the genuineness of the cash components of the labour charges -...

Addition u/s 40A (2) (b) - exponential increase in the Directors’ remuneration - CBDT Circular clearly states that no disallowance is to be made u/s 40A (2) in respect...

Levy of Service Tax - Manpower Services - The total outflow of labour charges has been divided into two parts. One part pertains to the labour charges paid to...

Revision u/s 263 - The records of the instant case speaks that no details were filed by the assessee before the Ld. A.O to prove the reasonableness of payments made to...

Disallowance u/s 40A (2)(b) - payment of higher salary to the Directors - When a Company pays higher salary to the Directors of the Managers or other Officers or...

Disallowance of salary expenses u/s 40A(2)(b) to relatives of the Directors - AO cannot sit on the arm chair of the assessee-company`s Board of Directors and decide that...

Disallowance made u/s 40A(2)(a) - higher salary paid to Directors - Related party transactions - the concerned directors are assessed to tax at the maximum rate of 30% -...

IT - Sec. 40A(2) - increase in remuneration to Directors - when CLB had approved the remuneration it could not be said that the expenditure was excessive or unreasonable - AT

Quick Updates: