Revision order u/s. 263 - examining the entire assessment ...

Income Tax

March 17, 2015

Revision order u/s. 263 - examining the entire assessment records and details filed before the AO by the assessee, which clearly proves that the AO has applied his mind - revision set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision order u/s. 263 - examining the entire assessment ...

Income Tax

March 17, 2015

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because that the AO did not discuss these details in the assessment order does not mean that he has not applied his mind.

Revision u/s 263 by CIT- underassessment of income - CIT doubted the expense claimed u/s. 57(iii) - Claim of general expenses against interest income - No doubt,...

Revision u/s 263 - Once AO has carried out detailed inquiry and verification of the documents and was satisfied with the net profit shown by the eligible unit as well as...

Revision u/s 263 - expenditure on purchased CDs on Jain Religion - AO had carried out detailed enquiries and taken a plausible view and accepted the assessee's treatment...

Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

Revision u/s 263 - AO made no enquiry for details of deposits neither anyalysed identity, genuineness and creditworthiness nor examined eligibility for deduction u/s....

Revision u/s 263 - Since the return filed by the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny, inter-alia, regarding deduction against income from other sources, the AO...

Revision u/s 263 - once the AO cannot examine any other issue except the issue as selected for limited scrutiny assessment, the PCIT can examine the only issue which was...

Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

Revision u/s 263 - The order of assessment, no doubt does not contain a detailed discussion on this aspect, but that however would not render the order as erroneous - AT

Quick Updates: