Valuation of goods - the amount charged from the customers as ...

Central Excise

April 4, 2015

Valuation of goods - the amount charged from the customers as carrying cost of the extra raw materia linventory would be includible in the assessable value - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of goods - the amount charged from the customers as ...

Central Excise

April 4, 2015

You may also like:

Valuation - inspection charges - cost of additional testing conducted at customer's request and borne by the customer is not includible in the assessable value of the goods - AT

Valuation of goods - dharmada charges are includible in the assessable value - transit insurance charges and freight charges are not includible - AT

Valuation - service for sold out machine - charges collected by the appellant from customer, whom the machines were sold long back, is not includible in the assessable...

Valuation of goods - Whether cylinder rental charges and cylinder repair/ testing charges would be includible in the assessable value of the gases being sold - Held No - AT

Valuation of goods - Inclusion of testing charges - Cylinder testing charges are not includible in the assessable value of the liquid chlorine and there is no infirmity...

Valuation of goods - Third party inspection - third party's inspection charges initially paid by the appellants and subsequently reimbursed by the buyers is not...

Valuation of imported goods - import and distribution of LPG - Canalising charges are includible in the assessable value of imports.

Valuation - if some goods are marketable without being put into the containers, the cost of containers including their testing charged would not be includible in the...

Valuation - Determination of transactional value - ship demurrage charges are not includible in the assessable value of the imported goods prior to CVR, 2007 coming into force - AT

Valuation - Job-work - The valuation of job worked goods computed by the department on the basis of cost of raw material + job work charges is incorrect.

Quick Updates: