Refund - Unjust enrichment - he records maintained did not ...

Customs

April 8, 2015

Refund - Unjust enrichment - he records maintained did not reflect the duty paid on the raw materials as the amount due/receivable from the department. In the absence of such an evidence, an inference drawn by the Cost Accountant cannot be said to be reasonable rebuttal of the statutory presumption - refund denied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - Unjust enrichment - he records maintained did not ...

Customs

April 8, 2015

You may also like:

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund Claim - unjust enrichment - As the entire amount has been recovered from the ultimate buyers including the duty element, unjust enrichment is attracted.

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Refund of amount paid under protest - undervaluation - the case of the assessee that it has not passed on the duty element stands established - there is no scope to...

Refund of duty paid under protest – unjust enrichment is not applicable where amount deposited under protest - AT

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Refund - valuation - price variation clause in the rate contract - excess payment of duty due to downward revision in the price / rate – unjust enrichment - refund allowed - AT

Quick Updates: