Transfer - Development agreement - unless there is willingness ...

Income Tax

April 9, 2015

Transfer - Development agreement - unless there is willingness on the part of the Developer to perform his part of the Contract, there cannot be a transfer of capital assets as envisaged u/s 2(47)(v) r.w.s. 53A of the Transfer of the Property Act - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Transfer - Development agreement - unless there is willingness ...

Income Tax

April 9, 2015

You may also like:

Capital gains on account of development agreement - Unless there is willingness on the part of the developer to perform his part of the contract, there cannot be a...

Capital gain on JDA - Transfer u/s 2(47) - There was no transfer of property under this JDA. Also without accrual of construction to the assessee, assessee was not...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As per PCIT AO omitted to examine the transaction of transfer of land held as “Stock-in-trade” in the light of the provision of...

Valuation of the service of construction provided by a builder/developer to a landowner, who transfers his land/development rights to builder - CBEC clarifies

Long Term Capital Gain u/s 45 - transfer u/s 2(47) - vacant land - Possession given by the society to the developer under joint development agreement - irrevocable...

Joint development agreement - Assessment of capital gain for Asst. Year 2007-08 - transfer of property - held as transfer - liable to capital gain - AT

Levy of GST - transfer of land or transfer of 'development rights' to the developer by the landowner - The liable to pay GST by the developer-promoter shall arise at the...

Transfer - development agreement - Starting words of s. 53A of the Transfer of Property Act are "where any person contracts" which means just the existence of a contract....

Capital gain - JDA entered - Transfer of capital asset - From a reading of the above clauses of the JDA, it is clear that the Developer will take possession of the...

Deduction u/s 80IA - treating the assessee-company as a ‘Contractor’ and not ‘Developer’ by the Department - merely because in the agreement for development of...

Quick Updates: