Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner ...

Service Tax

May 8, 2015

Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner (Appeals) that appellant was under a bonafide belief that service tax as demanded was not payable, then a view can not be entertained that the facts will justify imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner ...

Service Tax

May 8, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 78 - they were under bonafide belief that service provided from SEZ unit is not chargeable to Service Tax. Therefore the payment of Service Tax was escaped...

Extended period of limitation - bonafide belief - marketing agent service - Business Auxiliary Service - demand and penalty both set aside - AT

Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Levy of penalties u/s 77 and 78 - Bonafide belief - assessee had in fact recovered Service Tax periodically from the service recipient. Not only that such service tax...

Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Quick Updates: