Penalty for non maintenance of records - manufacturer of ...

Cigarette Manufacturer Avoids Penalty Due to Lack of Specified Record-Keeping Requirements Under Central Excise Rules, Circular No. 224/37/2005-CX.6.

June 26, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Penalty for non maintenance of records - manufacturer of cigarettes works under physical control - Applicability of Circular No. 224/37/2005-CX.6, dated 24-12-2008 - as the records are not specified in the central excise rules, no penalty can be levied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty for non maintenance of records - manufacturer of ...

Cigarette Manufacturer Avoids Penalty Due to Lack of Specified Record-Keeping Requirements Under Central Excise Rules, Circular No. 224/37/2005-CX.6.

June 26, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

The case involved the absolute confiscation of cigarettes with penalty u/s 105 of Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that while lack of compliance with Cigarettes and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Levy of penalty on an authorised courier - failure to collect KYC - There is no violation of the provisions of Regulation 12(i), (iv) and (v) as the appellant has...

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Records maintained by a registered Central Excise Manufacturer / Dealer - Article

Central Government amends Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 regarding client due diligence. Reporting entities must obtain KYC...

Bad Debts – The manufacturer has to bear the loss due to sedimentation - claim allowed - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting of income was challenged due to non-specification of clear charge. The Tribunal held that underreporting...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

The summary focuses on the irregular availment of the Composition scheme and various demands raised by the adjudicating authority, along with the CESTAT's findings. It...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Quick Updates: