Penalty u/s 271(1(c) - With the omission of the expression ...

Income Tax

July 4, 2015

Penalty u/s 271(1(c) - With the omission of the expression ‘deliberately’, mens rea is no longer a prerequisite for imposition of penalty - penalty under Section 271(1)(c ) is a civil liability and the wilful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1(c) - With the omission of the expression ...

Income Tax

July 4, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Levy of penalty - there is no mens rea or any premediated thought in non-complying with the statutory requirements, as no duty was actually payable upon import, being...

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The considerations for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act are however entirely different. It requires existence of mens rea...

Penalty levied u/s 271(I)(c) - Whether "Mens rea" is apparent in this case? - where the two regular appellate authorities have granted the relief to the Assessee by...

Penalty u/s 53 - Karnataka VAT - Once statutory contravention is established, then section 53(12) is attracted which provides for levy of penalty - presence of Mens Rea...

AO rightly levied the penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as the assessee has deliberately given inaccurate particulars of income.

CENVAT Credit availed wrongly on Capital goods - there is no sufficient evidence to prove Mens rea or guilt on the part of the assessee - no penalty - HC

Quick Updates: