Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of ...

Court Rules Excessive Royalties to State Legal Under Oilfield Act, Section 6A(4); Not Extortion, Allowed as Tax Deduction.

July 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of royalty in excess of 20% - Section 6A(4) of the Oilfield (Exploration and Development Act), 1948 - Certainly, we cannot liken it to hafta or extortion money, which appears to have been the intention - the amounts, which were paid, would not incur the opprobrium of being in violation of Section 37 - expenditure allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Payment made on account of royalty to State Govt - payment of ...

Court Rules Excessive Royalties to State Legal Under Oilfield Act, Section 6A(4); Not Extortion, Allowed as Tax Deduction.

July 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Conduct of lotteries - Power of Host State to make rules under section 12 of the Act to monitor the conduct of lotteries of Organising States within the territory of the...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central...

The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the Petitioners accused of using false documents and abetment. Citing legal precedents like u/s BHADRESH BIPINBHAI SHETH V....

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Explanations to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and Rule...

CESTAT ruled against inclusion of 4% running royalty in transaction value of imported goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The Tribunal found that...

Verification Certificate - Certificate under provisions of rule 114(4) of Income Tax Rules, 1962

Royalty paid by a mineral concession holder for mining concessions granted by the State is subject to GST levy. The constitutional validity of notifications issued by...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

The High Court considered the taxability of royalty receipts for obtaining computer software paid to a foreign resident. Citing relevant legal precedents, the Court held...

HC quashed the Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 25 April 2024 issued by State GST authorities regarding suspension of petitioner's GST registration. The court noted ongoing...

CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to...

Quick Updates: