ITAT declined to permit the Assessee to maintain the cross ...

High Court Overturns ITAT Decision, Allows Assessee to Raise Section 10A Benefits Claim Not Presented Earlier.

September 7, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

ITAT declined to permit the Assessee to maintain the cross objections on the ground that since the Assessee had not urged the plea of being entitled to the benefit under Section 10 A before the CIT (A), it could not be permitted to urge such plea for the first time before the ITAT - order of ITAT is not correct - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT declined to permit the Assessee to maintain the cross ...

High Court Overturns ITAT Decision, Allows Assessee to Raise Section 10A Benefits Claim Not Presented Earlier.

September 7, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Disallowance being amount of State Value Added Tax (VAT) paid for earlier years - Deduction u/s 80IB claimed - Assessee became liable to pay VAT for earlier years - The...

Transfer pricing adjustment on export commission paid to related party disallowed based on assessee's own case demonstrating benefits and higher profitability. Royalty...

HC allowed the petition, holding that a manufacturer/exporter can claim one input-side benefit and one output-side benefit without constituting double benefit. The court...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Bad debts - Disallowance of deduction claimed in respect of notional interest taxed as income in earlier year, which was not realized by the appellant - the assessee is...

The case before CESTAT Bangalore involved a refund claim seeking the benefit of a Notification under the Indo-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement. The issue was whether the...

Depreciation on sample flat - number of days asset used - the revenue has allowed the claim of 50% of the depreciation claimed by the assessee in the first year when the...

Excess work in progress detected during survey was accepted by assessee as income u/s 69B, taxable at 30%. Assessee claimed such income as part of closing stock to be...

ITAT held that indexation benefit for property acquisition shall be calculated from the allotment date (3/12/2010), allowing cost indexation based on payments made...

Exemption u/s 11 was not claimed in original return due to auditor's mistake in Form No. 10B. Assessee rectified mistake by filing revised Form No. 10B. Statutory claim...

The assessee, after being amalgamated with another company, treated the excess consideration paid over the net assets acquired as goodwill and claimed depreciation at...

The assessee claimed exemption u/s 10(23G), and the disallowance u/s 14 concerning exempt income was disputed. It was held that the assessee had sufficient interest-free...

Disallowing the exemption claimed u/s 54/54F - sale of the bungalow as well as the land - assuming the assessee has claimed deduction under section 54F of the Act, then...

The assessee claimed that no capital gain was chargeable on receipt from transfer of trademark as there was no cost of acquisition. However, the tribunal held that the...

Prior period expenses – even if this expenses are allowed in the earlier years i.e. A.Y. 2000-2001, it will ultimately be adjusted in the present year, by way of set off...

Quick Updates: