Denial of exemption claim - tribunal has clubbing the three ...

High Court Questions Tribunal's Decision to Combine Appeals Despite Separate Findings, Highlighting Inconsistencies in Rulings.

September 12, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Denial of exemption claim - tribunal has clubbing the three appeal and delivered different decisions - If there was justification for rendering a separate finding in the case of the Petitioner's Appeal, then, in the first instance it is not clear as to why it was clubbed along with other Appeals - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of exemption claim - tribunal has clubbing the three ...

High Court Questions Tribunal's Decision to Combine Appeals Despite Separate Findings, Highlighting Inconsistencies in Rulings.

September 12, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

If the Revenue was aggrieved with the decision of learned Commissioner (Appeals) in respect of both the appeals filed by the assessee, it should have filed two separate...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

The HC upheld the Tribunal's classification of the product as "Rusk" under Entry 77B instead of "Bread" under Entry 34, finding it to be hardened/toasted bread. The HC...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the classification of services provided by the appellant to overseas educational institutions, determining whether they constituted...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal concerning disallowance of exemption under s.10(23C)(vi). The Tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that the AO failed to...

The case pertains to the rectification of a mistake and reopening of assessment u/s 147 versus assessment u/s 153C. The information or seized document belonging to the...

One appeal filed by the Revenue against 7 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, when the Commissioner (Appeals)...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the maintainability of an appeal based on the monetary limit involved and the assessment made by the department. The Tribunal noted...

Quick Updates: