Duty demand - Assessee wrongly claiming exemption under ...

Central Excise

October 5, 2015

Duty demand - Assessee wrongly claiming exemption under Notification No.8/2002, dt.01.03.2002 - extended period of limitation - declared in the RT 12 return - claim of the notification wrongly would not amount to suppression of facts with intent to evade payment of duty. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Duty demand - Assessee wrongly claiming exemption under ...

Central Excise

October 5, 2015

You may also like:

Provisions contained in Rule 8 does not absolve the assessee from substantial conditions of payment of duty of claim of rebate of duty under Rule 18 of Central Excise...

Denial of duty exemption under Notification 21/2002-Cus – As the goods imported was secondary or defective – benefit of doubt extended to assessee - exemption granted - AT

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Refund claim of the duty - Notification No. 21/2002 - short supplied goods are not used in the manufacture of intended finished goods - Therefore, the benefit of...

Benefit of Notification No.56/2002 - area based exemption - Whether assesse was entitled to self-credit or was required to pay duty in cash out of their PLA - stay granted - AT

Business Auxiliary Service - demand based on ST-3 return - Benefit of Notification No. 14/2004-ST dated 10.9.2004 wrongly claimed - extended period is not invokable in...

Effective rates of Customs Duty on various products under notification no. 21/2002 Cus dated 1.3.2002 as last amended by notification 105/2011 dated 30.11.2011

Mid-day Meal Scheme - the assessee fulfils the requirements for entitlement to the exemption under the Notification dated 8-8-2011 - exemption allowed - AT

Classification of Slice Mango and Slice Orange - Classification under CH 2202.40 or 2202.99 - exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE - Classification adopted by the...

Exemption from CVD - import of mobile phones - the condition which was not possible of satisfaction - appellants were entitled to exemption from payment of CVD in terms...

Quick Updates: