Penalty for mis-declaration and misclassification of the goods ...

High Court Reinstates Penalties for Mis-declaration and Misclassification of Goods Under Customs Act Sections 111(m) and 112(a.

October 14, 2015

Case Laws Customs HC

Penalty for mis-declaration and misclassification of the goods in terms of Section 111(m) of the Customs Act and under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act – Tribunal order deleting the penalty is not correct - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty for mis-declaration and misclassification of the goods ...

High Court Reinstates Penalties for Mis-declaration and Misclassification of Goods Under Customs Act Sections 111(m) and 112(a.

October 14, 2015

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has...

CESTAT Bangalore upheld the imposition of penalty for misclassification of imported products under CTH 2938 instead of CTH 2106. The appellant mis-declared goods as 'Big...

Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. Exporter's explanation accepted regarding mismatch between goods and invoice. No deliberate mis-declaration...

CESTAT appellate tribunal determined copper rod import classification dispute. The tribunal upheld classification under CTH 74081190, rejecting CEPA exemption due to...

Goods were mis-declared in baggage declaration for export, rendering them liable for confiscation. Penalties imposed under Customs Act: Section 114 on individuals...

The case involved verification of Certificate of Origin and non-compliance of FSSAI Regulations u/s 111(m) and 112(a) of the Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the goods...

When there is mis-declaration of goods, show cause notice can be issued within a period of five years from the date of findng mis-declaration by the investigating authority - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of prohibited goods. Petitioner replied and attended personal hearing. Impugned order did not discuss hazardous waste...

Classification of imported goods - the appellant accepted the mis-declaration in writing. If the pipes and profiles were indeed old, the appellant could have, instead of...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Levy of penalty - Mis-declaration of goods - Self assessment of Bill of entry - While the importer is required to subscribe to the truth of the contents of the Bill of...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Quick Updates: