Tribunal was in error in coming to conclusion that since the ...

Customs

October 17, 2015

Tribunal was in error in coming to conclusion that since the goods have been exported and not available for confiscation, order of confiscation under Section 113 cannot be passed; Section 114 is thus sustainable - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal was in error in coming to conclusion that since the ...

Customs

October 17, 2015

You may also like:

Refund of IGST on export of goods on payment of duty-Clarification in case of SB003 errors and extension of date in SB005 & other cases using officer Interface for...

Export of exempted goods - medicaments - credit is available on “inputs used in mfg. of goods exported” even if goods are exempted - credit allowed - AT

Refund of IGST paid on export of goods under rule 96 of CGST Rules,2017 - an analysis by the CBEC of the common errors that are hindering the disbursal of IGST refund

Manufacture - marketability - Exemption to specified goods - The Tribunal having misread the entire evidence on record committed manifest error in reversing the order...

Rebate Claim - third party goods in addition to own goods exported after testing and repacking and duty paid at removal from Cenvat credit taken is available as rebate - CGOVT

Power of tribunal to decide an appeal on merit without addressing the issue of pre-deposit - tribunal has committed an error - remanded back to Tribunal to be heard afresh - HC

Rebate – jurisdiction of Tribunal – exclusion of the jurisdiction of the appellate Tribunal is expressly stated in the Statute - Tribunal was in error in entertaining...

IGST Export Refunds–resolution of errors

IGST Export Refunds–resolution of errors

Export of goods – Drawback claim – in the absence of retest of remnant samples as the remnant samples were not available - original authority directed to sanction the...

Quick Updates: