Mandatory pre deposit - As the amended Section 35F has a ...

Central Excise

November 21, 2015

Mandatory pre deposit - As the amended Section 35F has a retrospective operation and none of the petitioners herein has filed an appeal prior to 6/8/2014 before the appellate authority or if the appeal has been preferred subsequently has not deposited the requisite predeposit before the appellate authority, as the case may be, they are required to comply with the conditions of the amended Section 35F - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Mandatory pre deposit - As the amended Section 35F has a ...

Central Excise

November 21, 2015

You may also like:

Waiver of pre deposit - Mandatory pre deposit of 7.5% - Provision of section 35F, whether prospective or retrospective - date of SCN 05.06.2013 - Date of OIO 27.02.2015...

Power to waiver of mandatory pre-deposit - Section 129E does not empower the Tribunal or the Commissioner (Appeals) to waive the pre-deposit or to reduce the pre-deposit.

Whether the amount of pre-deposit ordered in the stay order for compliance with provisions of Section 35F can be deposited by the debiting the Cenvat Credit Account - Held yes - AT

Waiver of pre deposit - Mandatory pre deposit - amended Section 35F by requiring the appellant to deposit only 7.5%/10% of duty or penalty as the case may be, has in no...

Revision u/s 263 - provisions of Section 68 as amended given retrospective operation - Asking for source of source can be relevant inquiry - Demands confirmed - HC

Maintainability of appeal - making pre-deposit under Central Excise by debiting the Electronic Cash Ledger and Electronic Credit Ledger - it has to be held that...

Waiver of pre deposit - Section 35F - Mandatory pre deposit - in view of the amendment of the Section 35F of the Act, the Stay application is not maintainable. - AT

Restoration of appeal - failure to comply with the requirement of pre-deposit prescribed in section 35F - There is no justification for restoration of the appeal that...

Extension of time for pre-deposit - matter pending before high court - appellant wants to evade the mandate of Section 35F CEA as applicable to ST appeals - appeal...

Stay application - Mandatory pre deposit - Section 35F - if the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted then he is required to pre-deposit 100%...

Quick Updates: