Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2015 Year 2015 This

DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming ...

VAT and Sales Tax

November 27, 2015

DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming that the reassessment was justified. The fact that there was a dissenting opinion by one of the Members of the Tribunal, does indicate that it is not a case of concealment of particulars but a case where there is a possible interpretation in favour of the Assessee. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

  2. CE - imposition of penalties one on the proprietorship firm and second on the proprietor would amount to imposition of penalty twice, which cannot be sustained in the eyes of law

  3. It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

  4. Imposition of penalty - Penalty cannot be imposed if there is no malafide on part of importer, no tests have been carried out and no expert opinion has been obtained - AT

  5. Imposition of penalty - when there was conflict of judicial opinion before the issue stood settled by the judgment of this Court, it is not a case where penalty should...

  6. Regarding DST Period Demands. - Circular

  7. Imposition of penalty - inadmissible availment/utilization of Cenvat credit in the name of Baddi unit - In the instant case, the ‘surrender’ is not voluntary and levy of...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

  9. Reassessment - levy of entry tax - Once it was held that basis for reassessment was change of opinion, such reassessment was impermissible under law - HC

  10. Since the case involved blatant misuse of the trust placed by Revenue on the assessee and the appellants have cleared the goods without preparing invoices, the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates