Reopening of assessment - even without passing the order u/s ...

High Court Rules Notice u/s 148 Invalid Without Order u/s 143(3) for Taxpayer RJA.

November 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reopening of assessment - even without passing the order u/s 143(3), where the proceedings are pending, a notice u/s148 of the Act was issued to RJA asking it to file a return - This was impermissible in law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - even without passing the order u/s ...

High Court Rules Notice u/s 148 Invalid Without Order u/s 143(3) for Taxpayer RJA.

November 30, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC determined that typographical error in address on notice under s.148 of IT Act does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. Taxpayer's claim for India-Singapore DTAA...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The provisions relating to assessment and reassessment under the Act are proposed to be rationalized. Key amendments include: substituting sections 148 and 148A to...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction - objections were raised by the assessee u/s 124(3) of the Act, within one month of receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act...

The ITAT ruled in favor of the non-resident Indian taxpayer, invalidating the reopening of assessment under section 147. The notice under section 148 was initially...

The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Notice u/s 148 – Notice was issued in the name of amalgamating company which has been merged - the amalgamating company ceased to exist - Notice invalid - AT

The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week...

Notice issued u/s 148 beyond the limitation period prescribed under erstwhile provisions of section 149(1)(b) is barred by limitation, even after considering the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Bypassing the option to initiate scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - The assessment proceedings would cease to be pending either by...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Reassessment proceedings – Notice for 3 years - AO has not issued separate notice under section 148 and instead had issued a composite notice which does not meet the...

ITAT adjudicated a tax reassessment case involving procedural irregularities in notice service. The tribunal found that the Revenue department failed to substantiate...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Date of issuance of notice - communication in electronic form - Whether digitally signing notice would automatically amount to issuance...

Quick Updates: