Confiscation of goods - Revenue’s contention that appellant ...

Customs

December 3, 2015

Confiscation of goods - Revenue’s contention that appellant acted deliberately cannot be ruled out for the reason that an exporter who has not remitted higher amount of foreign exchange to this country does not expect higher quantity of goods with higher value. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confiscation of goods - Revenue’s contention that appellant ...

Customs

December 3, 2015

You may also like:

Condonation of delay - appellant had deliberately approached wrong forum to cause prejudice to the interest of Revenue - prayer for condonation rejected - AT

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Transhipment of goods - Goods Imported (Conditions of Transhipment) Regulations, 1995 - no confiscation could have been ordered under Section 111(d) and (f) of the...

Duty drawback claim - Revenue's contention that appellant acted deliberately cannot be ruled out for the reason that an exporter who has not remitted higher amount...

Extended period of limitation - Method of Valuation - section 4 or section 4A of Central Excise Act or not - there cannot be any reason to hold in the instant case that...

Goods supplied to SEZ - Whether goods supplies to SEZ Developers without payment of duty are to be treated as “exempted goods” under Rule 2(d) of the CCR, 2004 - Held No - AT

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notices u/s 142(1) - The provisions of Section 272A(1)(d) is of deterrent in nature and not for earning revenue. The remedy...

Release of seized goods - Arecanuts - prohibited goods - reason to believe - The High court finds that the Revenue Authorities failed to present credible and objective...

Levy of penalty u/s 114AA of Customs Act - illegal export of red sanders out of India - misuse of Import Export Code (IEC) - the Revenue has failed to establish the mala...

AO rightly levied the penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as the assessee has deliberately given inaccurate particulars of income.

Quick Updates: