Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal ...

Tribunal Wrongly Denied Refund Claim; Section 11-B Allows Any Person to Apply for Duty Refund, Not Just Sellers.

December 4, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal committed a manifest error in non-suiting the appellant's claim on the sole ground that the appellant was only a buyer and, therefore, was not entitled to claim a refund of the duty. This finding is patently perverse. Section 11-B of the Act provides that any person can make an application for refund of duty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal ...

Tribunal Wrongly Denied Refund Claim; Section 11-B Allows Any Person to Apply for Duty Refund, Not Just Sellers.

December 4, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

Refund claim - Duty paid wrongly on goods supplied for power projects eligible for exemption - Once the Department has accepted nonpayment of duty for the previous and...

Refund of anti dumping duty wrongly paid by the assessee - Refund of anti dumping duty wrongly paid by the assessee - Denial on the ground that the refund sought under...

The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

CESTAT allowed refund of customs duty paid twice through customs broker for same import consignment. Appellant demonstrated through Bill of Entry, payment challans, and...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

Refund of export duty paid in excess - conclusive evidence to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment - The CESTAT observed that the contract between the buyer and...

Refund of Excise Duty - Already 26 years have passed due to one mistake in the decision taken by the Assessing Authority - the Asseesing Authority passed an order...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Interest on refund claim - The tribunal, in its Order impugned wrongly applied the judgement of the Apex Court supra for purposes of denying the benefit of interest on...

Refund of excise duty paid - denial on the ground of time limitation - The Commissioner (Appeals) has wrongly invoked the provision of Clause (ec) for denying the refund...

Quick Updates: