Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by ...

Central Excise

December 12, 2015

Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by the manufacturer - the requisite evidence necessary for levy of penalty on each of the Appellants under Rule 26 of the CE Rules 2002 was not brought on record by the Department - no penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by ...

Central Excise

December 12, 2015

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

Levy of personal penalty on co-noticees - when the proceedings against the manufacturer/assessee stand concluded on payment of disputed amount of duty plus interest plus...

Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

Imposition of personal penalty on two Directors - valuation of goods - In any event, excise is a levy on manufacture and it is found that it is not the case of the...

Imposition of personal penalty on the Partner of the Firm in terms of Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994 - The case involved the imposition of a personal penalty on...

Imposition of penalties - Apart from the statement there are ample documentary evidences which clearly establish that appellants were involved in aiding and abetting...

Proof of malafide is an essential requisite for imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) read with Section 11AC of Central Excise Act - AT

Rule 3(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rule allows credit of duty “paid” by the input manufacturer and not the duty payable by the said manufacturer - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Personal penalty for abetment in evasion of duty of customs - In the context of Section 112(a) of the Customs Act,...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Quick Updates: