Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2015 Year 2015 This

Lump sum contract - specific job work of the parts on required ...

Service Tax

December 14, 2015

Lump sum contract - specific job work of the parts on required by Tata Motors deputing their persons - the activity cannot be equated with Man Power Recruitment or Supply Services - demand of service tax set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Royalty & lump sum fee – The payment of lump sum fees for the technical know-how and the royalty is allowable as revenue expenditure - AT

  2. CENVAT Credit - input services - The appellants are entitled for the Cenvat Credit on the maintenance services provided by Tata Motors Ltd. in respect of maintenance...

  3. Adjustment of short paid duty with excess duty paid - Job Work - Motor vehicles - HC refused to interfere into the order of CESTAT allowing adjustment.

  4. Man power recruitment or supply agency services or not - activity of bagging and shipping work executed by the appellant - such lump sum work order can be considered as...

  5. Exemption from GST - lump-sum amount received for Health care Services to be provided for 20 years by the applicant as “Diamond Plan” - Benefit of exemption is available - AAR

  6. Valuation - Job-work - The valuation of job worked goods computed by the department on the basis of cost of raw material + job work charges is incorrect.

  7. Valuation - The royalty and lump sum fees paid in relation to manufacture of goods in India cannot be padded on to the declared import value of the impugned goods.

  8. Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - Apparently, there is no reimbursement on actual basis and the exclusion under the category of 'reimbursement...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

  10. Lump sum sales tax on brick klin owners on the basis of production capacity is unconstitutional - Article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates