Imposition of penalty for abetment against the Chartered ...

Central Excise

December 18, 2015

Imposition of penalty for abetment against the Chartered Accountant for giving wrong certificate - This action could not be described as an act to attract penalty under Rule 26 and 27 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty for abetment against the Chartered ...

Central Excise

December 18, 2015

You may also like:

Refund claim - SAD - importer appointed a new Chartered Accountant, who becomes their regular Chartered Accountant and cannot be considered as a onetime independent...

Imposition of penalty - Misdeclaration of goods - Abetment in pilferage – whatever leniency he deserves, is already meted out to him at the hands of Tribunal -...

Penalty u/s 112(a) on Chartered Accountant (CA) for issuing false certificate - certificate issued on the basis of unsigned and unaudited documents - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act - abetment in smuggling - It is settled law that for imposition of penalty, it is necessary to establish a positive role on...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act - Penalty on CEO for abetment - Meaning of word abetment is "to help someone in wrong doing" - In the instant case such...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271A(2)(c) – delay in furnishing return for Tax Collection at Source (TCS) - The liability cannot be shifted on the Chartered Accountant or...

Export of the goods - claim of duty drawback - Mere allegation of wrong classification without proving intentional mala fide cannot lead to imposition of penalty - CGOVT

Levy of penalty - demand against wrongly claimed ITC - The benefit of this ITC was never granted by the revenue. Hence, it was not a case, where wrong information was...

Refund of Service Tax paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Service tax was paid under wrong head - Rejection of certificate of the Chartered Accountant - certificate...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - certificate of Chartered Accountant produced by the appellant was not disputed by bringing on record any other opinion contrary to the...

Quick Updates: