Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if ld. AO has treated the amount as ...

Income Tax

July 1, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if ld. AO has treated the amount as capital expenditure, certainly assessee will be entitled to claim depreciation but the crux is, it is allowable expenditure. Such situation certainly does not call for a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if ld. AO has treated the amount as ...

Income Tax

July 1, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of capital expenditure of Research and Development - The facts material to the computation were not produced - levy of...

Security deposit for lease - The character of the amount once shown as a capital nature will remained so even same was forgone due to dispute - cannot be treated as...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - difference of opinion with regard to the nature of expenditure would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - AT

Disallowance of expenditure u/s 37(1) - Amount paid as penalty for using electricity during restricted hours - the amount paid being penalty, the AO was justified in...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Having capitalized the amount of foreign exchange fluctuation in the relevant block of assets reveals its clear intent of treating it as capital...

Disallowance of expenses made u/s.37(1) - disallowance of expenditure on adhoc basis made by the ld. AO by giving a categorical finding that the ld. AO had not even...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no doubt on the issue that even when there is increase in the capital for the business of the company then also the expenditure would...

Quick Updates: