Minute scrutiny made in original assessment. Without there being ...

Income Tax

July 2, 2016

Minute scrutiny made in original assessment. Without there being anything additional on record, it would therefore, not be permissible for the Assessing Officer to reopen the assessment on the very same material.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Minute scrutiny made in original assessment. Without there being ...

Income Tax

July 2, 2016

You may also like:

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Re-opening of assessment - An agreement to sale without there being anything more,obviously cannot be equated with transfer of property. - HC

Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny assessment - AO has not referred to any credible or reliable material or information to form the view that there...

In cases under ‘Limited Scrutiny’, the scrutiny assessment proceedings would initially be confined only to issues under ‘Limited Scrutiny’ and questionnaires, enquiry,...

Scope of limited scrutiny - Assessing Officers should abide by the instructions of CBDT while completing limited scrutiny assessments and should be scrupulous about...

Scope of the Adjustment made by the CPC u/s 143(1) when scrutiny assessment made u/s 143(3) - Considering the facts that the case of the assessee was subsequently taken...

Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny assessment u/s 143 without obtaining necessary approval from the competent authority - such action of AO is against...

Validity of selection of case for scrutiny under compulsory scrutiny criteria - the assessee has challenged the scrutiny assessment as the Assessing Officer has not...

Reopening of assessment - AO has invoked the jurisdiction u/s 147 of the Act without completing original enquiry initiated u/s 143(2) - such proceeding is irregular and illegal

Validity of reopening - Validity of notice u/s 148 when scrutiny assessment was made but same was annulled - doctrine of merger is not applicable - reopening of the case...

Quick Updates: