Levy of penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - provision for bad debts and ...

Income Tax

July 14, 2016

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - provision for bad debts and loss on sale of fixed assets - the fact that the assessee immediately offered to rectify the mistake on detection is also undisputed. It is only that the claim of the bona fide of the assessee was not accepted by the department - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - provision for bad debts and ...

Income Tax

July 14, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

Claim of bad debts – advance given for purchase of capital assets are not allowable as bad debts/business loss - AT

Disallowance of bad debts written off - Admittedly, the provision was created by the assessee in the earlier year out of the profit and loss account. Thus, any...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Business loss or Bad Debts - written off of advances – advances given for material supply – held as business loss instead of bad debts - claim allowed - AT

Bad and doubtful debts written off disallowed – provision for bad and doubtful debts cannot be allowed u/s 36(1)(vii) - AT

Provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia) against the advances of rural branches - The circular mentions that the provisions of new clause (viia) of section...

Bad debts not allowed - loss incurred on sale of capital assets is not allowable u/s. 36 (1)(vii) of the Act as bad debt written off as well as business loss u/s. 37 of...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - appellant wrongly claimed loss by debiting it to P & L Account on account of loss on sale of assets whereas the same was capital loss and...

Allowance of bad debts - Provision made was pre-matured - It was only contingent liability or notional loss which could not be allowed as an expenditure under provisions...

Quick Updates: