Refund - unjust enrichment - Whether Chartered Accountant ...

Customs

July 23, 2016

Refund - unjust enrichment - Whether Chartered Accountant certificate alone is sufficient to show that the burden of duty has not been passed on to their customers - Since it is supported by corroborative evidence, refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - unjust enrichment - Whether Chartered Accountant ...

Customs

July 23, 2016

You may also like:

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - certificate of Chartered Accountant produced by the appellant was not disputed by bringing on record any other opinion contrary to the...

Refund - unjust enrichment - Merely because the amount was shown as expenditure it cannot be concluded that the burden of tax has been passed on to other indirectly - AT

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the Chartered Accountant’s Certificate has categorically certified that the burden has not been passed on to another. These documents...

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund - Principles of Unjust enrichment - Rubber cess - The appellant have clearly shown the amount of refund as receivable in their Books of Accounts and the same was...

Refund - unjust enrichment - burden to prove and to rebut - All the authorities have concurrently found that the assessee has failed to discharge that burden - no...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Simply stating that the goods were sold at a loss does not establish that the duty incidence was not passed - No refund - AT

Quick Updates: