Invokation of extended period of limitation - appellant has ...

Appellant's pipe valuation error due to incorrect method; no suppression found, extended limitation period not justified.

August 30, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Invokation of extended period of limitation - appellant has wrongly arrived at the valuation of the pipes cleared by them on the cost construction method rather the appellant should have paid duty on the value of pipes as indicated in the contract - Having failed to raise this issue at the material time it cannot be said that the appellants had suppressed or mis-declared anything to enable the revenue to invoke extended period of limitation - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Invokation of extended period of limitation - appellant has ...

Appellant's pipe valuation error due to incorrect method; no suppression found, extended limitation period not justified.

August 30, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Service tax liability in respect of general insurance premium - The Tribunal agreed with the appellant that service tax should be calculated based on the rates effective...

Constitutionality and legality of Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) II and Notification 87/2016, which mandate the use of the First In First Out (FIFO)...

Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Method of valuation of shares - closely held company issues its shares at a premium - The tribunal sided with the assessee, affirming the FMV...

Revision u/s 263 - issue of shares at premium - The Tribunal affirmed the PCIT's findings regarding the inadequacy of the AO's examination of the valuation of CCDs. It...

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to compute the assessee's income by adding the difference in valuation of shares u/s 56(2)(viib)....

Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

Method of valuation - Revenue neutrality - Extended period of limitation - goods transferred to another unit for captive consumption - to be valued in accordance with...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Method of Valuation - share premium receipts - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had obtained a valuation report from a registered valuer,...

Additions u/s 56(2)(viib) - it is not denied that the assessee adopted clause (b) of Rule 11UA(2) of the Rules and accordingly obtained a Valuation Report from a...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

TP Adjustment - Fair market value of share of ECL representing the ALP - the DCF Method could not be adopted in the facts and circumstances of the present case as the...

CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible for benefits under N/N.12/2003-ST for outdoor catering services. The tribunal found no legal...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - In this case, the Assessing Officer has not found any specific fault in rejecting or not satisfying with the valuation made by the assessee....

Quick Updates: