Imposition of penalty - appellant contend that it is purely a ...

Central Excise

September 2, 2016

Imposition of penalty - appellant contend that it is purely a matter of interpretation - Cenvat Credit in respect of construction services for the construction of guest house, staff quarters, flooring work at colony, septic tank of security barracks, club house, bank building, hawankund shed, temple etc. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - appellant contend that it is purely a ...

Central Excise

September 2, 2016

You may also like:

Cenvat credit - Business Auxiliary Service - Services of commission agents – if the Cenvat Credit Rules permit Cenvat credit in respect of certain services, the same has...

Cenvat Credit - Outdoor catering - input services - Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules(CCR), 2004 – statutory obligation under the Factories Act

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Whether certain pollution control services availed by the appellant are eligible to CENVAT Credit under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 - Held Yes,...

Refund of CENVAT Credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

Cenvat Credit - Under the rule 7 of CENVAT credit rules there is no bar denying the credit in respect of the invoices of the period prior to date of the registration - AT

Cenvat Credit - pre-mature credit on input services - credit availed before making payment - Scope of Rule 4(7) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - credit cannot be denied - AT

Denial of CENVAT credit - though the appellant has availed CENVAT credit belatedly which is well within the provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - credit allowed - AT

CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - Rule 9(1)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - CENVAT Credit on the basis of photocopy of seven bills of entry - Credit allowed - AT

CENVAT credit - levy of penalty - it was only with the insertion of Explanation III in rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 that the ineligibility became unambiguously...

Quick Updates: