Interestate sale of cement - whether the appellant is entitled ...

VAT and Sales Tax

September 17, 2016

Interestate sale of cement - whether the appellant is entitled to dual benefit of partial exemption under the notification dated 06.05.1986 and also the lower rate of tax @ 6% under notification dated 21.01.2000 - Once circular dated 15.04.1994 stands withdrawn vide circular dated 16.04.2001, the appellant-assessee cannot claim the benefit of the withdrawn circular. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Interestate sale of cement - whether the appellant is entitled ...

VAT and Sales Tax

September 17, 2016

You may also like:

100% EOU - appellants claimed that cement is capital goods and, therefore, they were entitled to the benefit of duty paid on cement under Notification No. 1/95 - No exemption - HC

Benefit of exemption - Clearance of Cement bags marked with MRP for captive Consumption - The benefit of Sl.No.1A of the Notification will be allowable for cement...

Benefit of exemption Notification No. 61/86-C.E., dated 10-2-1986 - Benefit to driver's seats meant for hydraulic excavators - demand within the normal period of...

Micro SD/Mine storage cards are classifiable under CTH 8523.51 as non-volatile storage devices and the assessees are entitled to the benefit of exemption Notification No....

Classification of imported goods - aluminous cement - the correct classification of the impugned goods is under CTH-25233000 and the respondent is entitled the benefit...

Disallowance of CENVAT Credit - Job works - Whether the job workers can prefer to pay excise duty in spite of having exemption notification bearing no. 214 of 1986 - held yes - AT

Where there are two exemption notifications that cover the goods in question, the assessee is entitled to the benefit of that exemption notification which gives him...

Exemption from CVD - import of mobile phones - the condition which was not possible of satisfaction - appellants were entitled to exemption from payment of CVD in terms...

Benefit of Exemption Notification 6/2003 – addition of saccharine would not result in sweetened scented supari rather than only scented supari - exemption allowed - AT

Denial of benefit of Exemption from SAD - import of pig hair bristles which were exempted from sales tax - benefit of exemption Notification No. 34/98-Cus not available - SC

Quick Updates: